Connect with other like minded historians in your region
Connect with chapters in your area, present research, receive constructive feedback, and network with fellow historians. All students are welcome to attend—but only Phi Alpha Theta members are eligible for prizes.
Regional conferences are the heartbeat of Phi Alpha Theta—dynamic gatherings where history students from across your region come together to share research, exchange ideas, and build the professional connections that shape academic careers.
Held approximately three dozen times each year across the country, these conferences provide an invaluable forum for both undergraduate and graduate students to present their scholarly work in a supportive, professional environment. Whether you're presenting your first paper or refining research for publication, regional conferences offer the perfect platform to develop as a historian.
Regional conferences are designed specifically for student success. You'll present to engaged audiences, receive expert feedback from faculty evaluators, and connect with peers who share your passion for history. Many students cite their first regional conference presentation as a turning point in their academic journey.
Hosting a regional conference is a rewarding opportunity to showcase your chapter and institution while strengthening the Phi Alpha Theta community in your region. National Headquarters provides funding, support, and guidance throughout the planning process. Learn more about hosting →
Share your historical research with an audience of peers and faculty who genuinely want to hear what you've discovered. Present papers on any historical topic, period, or methodology—regional conferences celebrate the full diversity of historical scholarship.
Get constructive criticism from experienced faculty evaluators who are invested in your development as a scholar. This feedback is invaluable for refining your research, strengthening your arguments, and improving your presentation skills.
Meet students and faculty from other institutions who share your interests. These connections often lead to collaborative projects, graduate school recommendations, and lasting professional relationships.
Phi Alpha Theta members are eligible for awards and prizes at regional conferences. Winners receive book awards and may be invited to present at the Biennial Convention or submit papers to The Historian for publication consideration.
Papers are typically 10-12 pages (20-25 minutes when read aloud) and grouped into thematic panels with 3 papers per session. After presentations, you'll engage in Q&A and receive feedback from faculty evaluators.
Regional conferences include continental breakfast, lunch with a keynote speaker, and plenty of informal time to connect with other history enthusiasts. These social elements are just as valuable as the formal presentations!
Many regionals offer workshops on topics like graduate school applications, navigating the job market, starting chapter publications, and effective leadership in student organizations.
Regional conferences are designed to be supportive and encouraging—especially for first-time presenters. The goal is to help you grow as a scholar, not to intimidate or critique harshly.
Don't worry! Everyone was a first-timer once. Regional conferences are specifically designed to be welcoming environments for emerging scholars. Your faculty advisor can help you prepare, and the feedback you receive will be constructive and encouraging.
Develop confidence and expertise in presenting scholarly work—skills essential for graduate school, academic careers, and professional success in any field.
Receive feedback that helps you refine arguments, discover new sources, and think critically about your work from different perspectives.
Connect with students and faculty from across your region. These relationships often lead to collaboration, mentorship, and career opportunities.
Compete for awards and prizes. Winners gain prestige and opportunities to present at larger conferences or publish in The Historian.
Conference presentations significantly strengthen graduate school applications, scholarship proposals, and professional portfolios.
Learn about graduate programs, internships, research opportunities, and career paths directly from faculty and students in the field.
Let your chapter's faculty advisor know you're interested in attending or presenting at a regional conference. They'll have information about upcoming meetings in your area and can help you prepare.
Only active Phi Alpha Theta members are eligible to compete for awards at regional conferences. If you're not yet a member, ask your advisor about joining!
If presenting, develop a 10-12 page research paper suitable for a 20-25 minute presentation. If attending as an observer, you're still welcome—and it's a great way to learn before presenting yourself!
Follow the call for papers instructions from the host chapter. Include your paper and a brief biography to be used when introducing you as a presenter.
Present your research, attend other panels, network during meals and breaks, and participate in workshops. Most importantly—enjoy the experience and learn from your peers!
Don't wait to begin your journey as a presenting historian. Regional conferences offer the perfect opportunity to share your research, develop professional skills, and connect with the broader Phi Alpha Theta community.
Official form for reporting regional conference results, attendance, and award winners to National Headquarters.
Download Form →Model evaluation rubric for faculty judges to assess student presentations consistently and constructively.
Download Sample →Template letters for invitations, calls for papers, and correspondence with participating chapters and institutions.
Download Templates →The Historian welcomes manuscripts submitted by historians throughout the world and from all regional, temporal and thematic fields of history. Submissions should be of interest to a wide readership. Manuscripts that have been published elsewhere, that are being considered for publication elsewhere, or that present themselves as op-ed pieces, will not be considered.
Manuscripts should normally be between 6,000 and 8,000 words, exclusive of footnotes. They are to be double-spaced, with one-inch margins (right margin unjustified). Submissions are expected to meet the highest standards of academic quality, have an original point, be in dialogue with all the relevant literature, and either be based on new source material, or constitute an exhaustive and critical overview of the historiography of a particular topic. They need to be written in flawless English. Please Americanize the English—e.g., “labor” rather than “labour,” “defense” rather than “defence,” “analyze” instead of “analyse”—except if the word(s) in question are part of a quote or title. Citations must be accurate and precise, indicating the sources of the argumentation, and must conform to The Chicago Manual of Style, latest edition.
We only publish original articles and do not publish translations of essays published previously in another language.
The Historian recognizes the expanding use of artificial intelligence (AI) by authors for their research. It is important, however, for those who submit their work for review to distinguish between AI used for assistive versus generative purposes, as well as what authors must disclose.
“Assistive” AI refers to tools that make suggestions to improve one’s work, including grammar, spelling, and translating one’s words into English. Authors need not disclose the use of AI for such purposes.
“Generative” AI refers to tools—among them large language models (LLMs), machine learning, and similar programs—that rewrite large portions of one’s manuscript; that produce source material or images; or that affect the ideas or conclusions presented. According to the policy of Taylor and Francis, which publishes The Historian, “Authors must clearly acknowledge within [an] article…any use of Generative AI tools through a statement that includes: the full name of the tool used (with version number), how it was used and the reason for use.” For The Historian, that acknowledgement must appear in a footnote. It is important to note that The Historian strongly discourages the use of AI for generative purposes and may disqualify a submission on that rationale alone.
Should the editor discover that a work submitted used any generative AI tools without disclosure, they reserve the right to reject that work at any point during the process of publication.
Authors are strongly encouraged to review Taylor and Francis’ AI policy, which can be found here: https://taylorandfrancis.com/our-policies/ai-policy/.
If a submission complies with the above requirements, usually specialists in fields relevant to the topic and holding the doctoral degree are selected to review the submission anonymously. The substance of these reports will be relayed to the author by the editor. On the basis of reviewer reports, the editor decides whether to proceed with publishing.
If your manuscript complies with the above requirements, please send one copy, in MSWord, as an e-mail attachment to historianeditor@phialphatheta.org. The author’s name should be included on the title page only. Authors should also send a one-hundred-word summary abstract of the article and their e-mail address(es).
Evaluation of manuscripts generally requires four to six months. We encourage inclusion of photographs, maps, and other illustrative material, which must be provided in camera-ready form, with authorization from copyright holders for these materials’ reproduction in The Historian. Manuscripts are edited for organization, clarity, and consistency.
Authors with any questions about The Historian’s policies are encouraged to contact the editor at historianeditor@phialphatheta.org.
Prefer a copy to keep? Download the full policy.
Download Policy (.odt)